PRACTICAL POINTERS
FOR
PRIMARY
CARE
ABSTRACTED MONTHLY FROM THE JOURNALS
JANUARY 2006
FINAL QUESTION:
ARE YOU AT PEACE?
YOUR PATIENT WITH
ATRIAL FIBRILLATION HAD MASSIVE
BLEEDING WHILE ON WARFARIN—Would You Be Reluctant To Prescribe Warfarin For A
Second Patient Presenting With AF?
THE PROMISE OF NEW
ROTAVIRUS VACCINES
HIGH MIDLIFE BMI INCREASES
RISK OF HOSPITALIZATION AND MORTALITY IN OLDER AGE
WATCHFUL WAITING VS REPAIR OF INGUINAL HERNIA IN MINIMALLY SYMPTOMATIC MEN
VITAMIN D INSUFFICIENCY
STATE DURING PREGNANCY IMPACTS BONE DENSITY IN THE CHILD
ASPIRIN FOR THE
PRIMARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN WOMEN
AND MEN
HIGH FRUIT AND
VEGETABLE CONSUMPTION ASSOCIATED WITH REDUCED STROKE
POPULATION-WISE, METABOLIC SYNDROME IS A MUCH GREATER RISK FACTOR FOR STROKE THAN DIABETES
HELICOBACTER
ERADICATION MARGINALLY REDUCES PREVALENCE OF
DYSPEPSIA
CDC RECOMMENDS NEW
TUBERCULOSIS BLOOD TEST.—QuantiFERON-TB Gold
MAGNET THERAPY—No Evidence Of Value
VENOUS
THROMBOEMBOLISM—18 Clinical Points
JAMA, NEJM, BMJ, LANCET PUBLISHED
BY PRACTICAL POINTERS, INC.
ARCHIVES INTERNAL MEDICINE EDITED BY RICHARD T.
JAMES JR. MD
ANNALS
INTERNAL MEDICINE
www.practicalpointers.org
This
document is divided into two parts
1) The HIGHLIGHTS AND EDITORIAL COMMENTS
HIGHLIGHTS condenses
the contents of studies, and allows a quick review of pertinent points of each
article.
----------
EDITORIAL COMMENTS are the
editor’s assessments of the clinical practicality of articles based on his
long-term review of the current literature and his 20-year publication of
Practical Pointers.
2) The main ABSTRACTS section is designed as a reference. It
presents structured summaries of the contents of articles in much more detail.
I hope you will find Practical Pointers interesting and helpful. The complete content of
all issues for the past 5 years can be accessed at www.practicalpointers.org
Richard T. James Jr, M.D.
Editor/Publisher.
HIGHLIGHTS AND EDITORIAL
COMMENTS
JANUARY 2006
One Simple
Non-Threatening Question To Probe Spiritual Concerns At The End Of Life.
Acknowledging
the importance of emotional and spiritual issues at the end of life is an
important component of compassionate and comprehensive palliative care. Some
physicians may question the appropriateness of their role in probing patients’
spiritual distress, as well as the practicality of addressing such issues in
the time-limited setting of usual practice. Yet, a patient’s spirituality often
influences treatment choices, and endows personal resources during serious
illness.
Respondents
(n = 248) completed several questionnaires which assessed quality-of-life at
the end of life. All had advanced cancer, severe heart failure, severe COPD, or
renal failure.
Examined
distributions of several religious and non-religious alternative wordings—“at
peace with God”; “at peace with my personal relationships”; “at peace with
myself”. To promote inclusiveness, the final wording was the simple
question--“Are you at peace?”
Ninety
% agreed with the importance of “coming
to peace with God”. Ranked equally, and as most important, “freedom from pain”
and “being at peace with God”. Items
measuring peacefulness correlated highly with having a chance to say goodbye;
with making a positive difference in the lives of others; giving others gifts
and wisdom; sharing deepest thoughts; and having a sense of meaning in life.
Feeling at
peace was strongly correlated with emotional and spiritual well-being.
“The
results of this study suggest that the concept of patients’ sense of being at
peace may be a point in which to initiate a conversation about emotional and
spiritual concerns in a non-threatening
manner.”
Spirituality
has been defined as the search for the ultimate meaning and purpose of life.
This often involves a relationship with the transcendent. Emotional and
spiritual well-being underpin the broadly worded construct of “being at peace”.
Patients’
end-of-life experiences are constructed by multidimensional layers of
relationships of physiological and biochemical processes, cognitive
understandings, interpersonal connections, and bonds to the transcendent.
Asking
patients about the extent to which they are at peace may offer a gateway to
assessing spiritual concerns. Although these issues may be heightened at the
end of life, it may influence medical decisions throughout a lifetime of care.
----------
Read the original!
Being at peace is important at all phases of life.
Asking a non-terminal 30-year old if he is at peace may lead to introspection
and benefit.
1-2 IMPACT OF
ADVERSE EVENTS ON PRESCRIBING WARFARIN IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
This study
quantified the influence of physicians’ experiences of adverse events in
patients for whom they had prescribed warfarin on their subsequent prescribing
practices.
Considered
patients who experienced severe gastrointestinal bleeding or hemorrhagic stroke
while taking warfarin during the 120 days before admission to the hospital. Determined likelihood that the
doctor who prescribed the warfarin would prescribe it to the next patient
presenting with AF. (If a physician treated a patient with warfarin and the
patient had serious bleeding, would this experience influence prescribing
warfarin for a second patient who has AF? )
Also
considered patients with AF who experienced an ischemic stroke during the
preceding 120 days for whom the doctor had not
prescribed warfarin. Determined the likelihood that the doctor would prescribe
warfarin to the next patient with AF who consults him.
Over 500
physicians treated a patient with AF who had major bleeding while on warfarin,
and then treated another patient with AF within the next 90 days.
The odds
that a physician would prescribe warfarin for a second patient were 21% lower
after a first patient experienced bleeding. (Some physicians were reluctant to
again prescribe warfarin.)
Conversely,
there were no significant changes in warfarin prescribing after a patient had a
stroke while not taking warfarin.
(Physicians were no more likely to
prescribe warfarin for a second patient with AF despite this adverse outcome.)
“Doctors
are neither passive recipients of, nor simple conduits of, clinical evidence.”
We conduct an “inner consultation” with evidence, analyzing it in both a
logical and intuitive way. In doing so, we are more likely to recall events
which are more easily recalled. And the “chagrin factor” tends to make doctors
avoid actions that cause them hassle.
Patients
conduct similar internal consultations, adding the experience of a consultation
to their previous intellectual and emotional understanding of illness.
“Statistical
experience” and “clinical experience” guide consultations. These are not enough
to clarify the dynamic interaction between patient and doctor. A third
dimension is “personal significance”, a concept that captures the reciprocity
of the evaluation and interpretation of a new idea by a doctor and patient
together. At stake here is something quite profound, and poorly accepted within
the medical community—the personal participation of the knower in all acts of
understanding. Comprehension is neither an arbitrary nor passive act. It
requires tacit skills of judgment.
“In medical
consultations there are two participants, both personally knowing, both
passionately participating, but from
different perspectives, different “somewheres”. The outcome of their
interaction in the form of clinical decision is an emergent property of two
ways of knowing: biomedical and biographical.
The study
illuminates this murky area and provides convincing evidence that within each
doctor, these two ways of knowing compete for influence.
----------
Patient’s prior experience plays a major role in
acceptance and compliance with therapy. This study points out that doctors
respond to prior experience as well.
Patients and doctors consider adverse events due to
commission more seriously than adverse events due to omission. When a patient
with AF bleeds while he is taking warfarin, warfarin and the doctor who
prescribes it get the blame (whether at
fault or not). When the patient experiences an ischemic strike, there is doubt
about whether warfarin would have prevented it. (It may not have prevented it.) Warfarin and the doctor would less likely be
blamed.
Prior experiences and “personal knowledge” do indeed
influence subsequent practice.
Do not patients’ “personal beliefs” have a much greater influence on their acceptance and
compliance with treatments? Eg, belief in a placebo; belief in many
“alternative medications”; belief in the advertisements of drug companies;
beliefs based on ethnicity and family lore, belief in anecdotal experiences and
advice of family and friends; belief
in health advice given in the press, on
TV, and in the Internet.
Do not physicians’
“personal beliefs” influence the treatments they advise to a greater
extent than evidence-based therapy? Eg,
belief in the latest advertised drug; belief in the suggestions of colleagues
given in curbside consultations; belief based on their educational experiences
and past training which have become outdated; belief in anecdotal evidence from
small, unsubstantiated observational
studies, and even “alternative medicine”.
“The Time
For A Rotavirus Vaccine May Have Finally Arrived.”
1-3 THE PROMISE OF
NEW ROTAVIRUS VACCINES
This issue
of NEJM reports promising results from large clinical trials of two new oral
vaccines:
1)
Rotateq (Merck) is a penta-valent
vaccine based on a bovine strain that contains 5 human-bovine viruses. It is
naturally attenuated for humans. The bovine virus grows less well in the human
intestine, so the aggregate titer required to immunize is greater. Three oral
doses are required, with at least a month between doses. The vaccine strains
are infrequently shed in the stool. It
is not broadly cross-protective against other serotypes.
2) Rotarix (Glaxco Smith-Kline) is an attenuated, mono-valent vaccine derived
from the most common human retrovirus strain. It is given in two doses one
month apart.. It replicates well in the gut, and is frequently shed (like
natural infections) in the stool. It cross-protects against most other
serotypes.
Both
vaccines demonstrate impressive efficacy against severe disease (85% to 98%) .
Both
vaccines demonstrated a reassuring safety profile. There was no significant
difference in the rate of intussusception between the vaccine and placebo
----------
This may be a giant step forward.
I do not understand the pathophysiology of the
increased risk of intussusception reported in studies of the old vaccine
(1999). Anyone out there who can suggest a connection?
Obesity Per Se In Middle Age Is A
Risk Factor For CVD And Diabetes In Older Age
1-4 MIDLIFE BODY MASS
INDEX AND HOSPITALIZATION AND MORTALITY IN OLDER AGE
Does excess
weight in middle life confer higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes in older age? Does a
high body mass index (BMI) per se confer risks over time
independent of its effect on BP and lipids?
This
prospective study, begun in 1967-73, entered over 17 000 subjects age 31 to 64
(mean age = 45). All were free of coronary heart disease (CHD) , diabetes, and major electrocardiography abnormalities.
At
baseline, classified CVD risk as: 1) Low
risk: BP < 120/80; total cholesterol
< 200; and non smoking. 2) Moderate risk:
BP 121-139/81-89; total cholesterol 200-239; non smoking; 3) Higher risk groups included subjects with
any 1, 2, or 3 risk factors (BP > 140/90; total cholesterol > 240; and
current smoking.
BMI
categories: normal 18.5-24.9; overweight 25-29.9; obese 30 and over.
At
baseline, only 7% of the entire cohort over 17 000 were at low risk. And only
4% were at both low risk and normal BMI.
Low risk group: (normal BP, normal
cholesterol, and non-smoking)
Rate after
age 65 per 1000 persons CHD
mortality Hospitalization for CHD Diabetes
Normal BMI 30 40 44
Overweight 42 49 110
Obese 44 112 265
Moderate
risk group: (moderately elevated BP and cholesterol, non-smoking)
Rate after
age 65 per 1000 persons CHD mortality Hospitalization
for CHD Diabetes
Normal BMI 42 53 60
Overweight 49 95 122
Obese 89 104 240
In higher
risk groups (including smokers) as BMIs rose, outcomes rose in a similarly
graded fashion. Within each risk
stratum, the risk was higher for overweight and obese persons than for normal
weight persons.
Non-smoking
individuals with normal BP and normal total cholesterol who are obese in middle
age have a higher risk of hospitalization and mortality from CHD and diabetes
in older age than those whose weight is normal in middle age. This risk
relationship extends to those with higher cholesterol and BP and to those who
smoke.
Is Watchful
Waiting A Safe And Acceptable Option?
1-5 WATCHFUL WAITING VS REPAIR
OF INGUINAL
HERNIA IN MINIMAL SYMPTOMATIC MEN
Patients
often delay hernia repair until pain or discomfort occurs.
Surgical
repair, while generally safe and effective, carries a long-term risks of
recurrence, pain, and discomfort.
For minimally symptomatic men, the usual
basis for recommending surgery is prevention of incarceration and
strangulation. These are rare events.
Is deferring surgical repair a safe and
acceptable option for men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias?
This study
entered 724 men with inguinal hernias. (mean age = 57.) All were asymptomatic
or had minimal symptoms. (No discomfort which limited usual activity. No
difficulty in reducing the hernia. )
Randomized
to: 1) watchful waiting, or 2) tension-free repair surgery.
What
happened to the surgery group? 1)
Intraoperative complications in 3 patients:
wound hematoma requiring return to operating room; postanesthetic
hypotension; and ilioinguinal nerve injury.
2) Postoperative complications in 22%: hematomas; urinary tract
infections; wound infections; orchitis; urinary retention; postoperative
bradycardia; deep venous thrombosis; postoperative hypertension. 3) Overall, at 2 years, discomfort was reduced slightly, but pain
limited usual activities in 2%. 4) 3%
of hernias recurred. 5) More than 97%
were satisfied with the treatment they received.
What
happened to the watchful waiting group?
1) Pain limiting usual activities occurred in 5%. 2) Cross-over to surgery 23% at 2 years, 33% at 5 years (mainly due
to increased pain) 3) Complications: incarceration, bowel obstruction rare, ~ 2 in
1000 patient-years. 4) More than 97%
were satisfied with the treatment they received. Overall, they experienced a
slight lessening of discomfort over 2 years.
A strategy
of watchful waiting (over 2 years) is a safe and acceptable option for men with
minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias.
----------
The study does not include symptomatic hernias.
Natural history studies are valuable for informing
patients when they ask—What is going to happen to me?” What should I do about
it? This study gives some indication of
the outcomes of surgery vs WW. However, the observation period lasted a
relatively short time in the life of a hernia.
Discussions between physician and patient about likely
outcomes will aid negotiations between the two and enable the patient to make
informed decisions. Whether to have a non-troublesome hernia repaired is an
intensely personal decision. The decision will depend on many factors, two of
which are 1) the duration of the hernia.2)
the age of the patient.
I believe patients whose hernias have been present for
a long time and have remained non-troublesome will be more likely to avoid
surgery. Recently developed hernias may cause more alarm and would lead the
patient to seek a surgical consultation and tilt toward surgery.
A young man, because of his long life span, may be
more accepting of surgery. He may be
less willing to accept worry, bother, and anxiety over years. His hernia will
be more likely to enlarge with time, and he will be more likely to develop pain
and complications. (Note the study lasted only 2 to 4[MSOffice1] years.)
An old man may be less wiling to accept surgery
because his life span is shorter. He is
more likely to have co-morbidity and increased risk of surgical complications.
Another important consideration:
Availability of an experienced surgeon with a proven track record of fewer
perioperative complications and recurrence of the hernia.
The main message of this study is to point out to
middle-aged men with asymptomatic hernias that they may safely defer surgery at
least for several years.
Vitamin D
Deficiency During Pregnancy Is Associated With A Deficit In Bone-Mineral
Accrual In The Children
1-6 MATERNAL VITAMIN D STATUS DURING PREGNANCY, AND CHILDHOOD
BONE MASS AT AGE 9 YEARS
This study
tested the hypothesis that low vitamin D levels in women during pregnancy have
persisting effects on bone mass in their children.
Measured
serum 25(OH)-vitamin D at a mean of 34 weeks of pregnancy. Classified vitamin D
levels as being deficient if the serum level was under 11 ug/L and as
insufficient if level was 11-20. Normal > 20.
Nine years
later, measured children’s’ bone mineral content (BMC) and areal bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Eighteen % of women had insufficient vitamin D levels,
and 31% had deficient levels. (Half of all women.)
At age 9,
children of mothers with reduced concentrations of vitamin D had reduced
whole-body and lumbar spine bone mass compared with children of mothers with
normal serum vitamin D.
Maternal UV
exposure during late pregnancy varied by season and predicted serum
concentrations of D. (Mean levels in winter = 14 ug/dL; summer = 30 ug/dL).
Children of mothers whose third trimester occurred in summer had higher BMD
than those whose third trimester occurred in winter.
Use of
vitamin D supplements predicted maternal concentrations of vitamin D. (In this
cohort, only 15% of mothers took supplements containing vitamin D.) Their
children at age 9 had significantly greater whole-body BMD than children of
non-users.
“Our
results suggest that vitamin D insufficiency (or deficiency) during late
pregnancy is associated with a deficit in bone-mineral accrual in their
children which persists to age 9.”
Vitamin D
deficiency and insufficiency were common in these pregnant women. Supplementation could lead to enhanced peak
bone mineral accrual in their children, and lead to reduced risk of fragility
fracture later in life.
----------
Can these deficient children catch up as they grow
older? I believe good nutrition including adequate calcium intake and vitamin
supplementation (especially D) will allow catch up.
Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent in developed
countries in northern latitudes in the winter. I believe it is by far the most
common vitamin deficiency. Supplements are required life long.
Prevents
Stroke In Women; MI In Men
1-7 ASPIRIN FOR THE PRIMARY PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS
IN WOMEN AND MEN A Sex-Specific Meta-Analysis Of Randomized
Controlled Trials
The
American Heart Association has reported aspirin therapy is effective in primary prevention of coronary heart
disease in adults of both sexes who are at increased risk. The AHA guidelines on
primary prevention recommend low-dose aspirin in women whose 10-year risk of a
first coronary event exceeds 20%, and consideration for those with a 10-year
risk of 10% to 20%.
This
meta-analysis determined if benefits and risks of aspirin therapy in primary
prevention differed between men and women.
In absolute terms:
A.
Women: Aspirin for an average of 6
years resulted in a benefit of approximately 3 cardiovascular events
and 2
strokes prevented per 1000 women. No effect on MI or cardiovascular mortality.
B. Men:
Aspirin for an average of 6 years resulted in a benefit of approximately 4
cardiovascular events
prevented
per 1000 men. MI was significantly reduced (absolute benefit of 1 MI per 125
men treated).
No
statistically significant reduction in stroke.
Major bleeding (mainly GI) occurred
over 6 years in 1 of every 400 women and 1 in 300 men.
(2.5 major
bleeds per 1000 women and 3 per 1000 men.)
----------
The benefits of aspirin for primary prevention do not
approach the substantial benefits in secondary prevention.
When negotiating a treatment plan with women who may
be interested in aspirin for primary prevention of CVD, clinicians may tell them the benefit over 6
years in preventing ischemic stroke is 1 in 500. The risk of major bleeding is 1 in 400 .
Men may be told the benefit over 6 years in preventing
MI is 1 in 150. And the risk of major
bleeding is 1 in 300.
Note that these benefit and harm effects in this study
occurred in persons considered healthy.
Do the benefits outweigh the harms? In this study,
benefits and harms balanced about equally. Individuals may decide for
themselves after being fully informed. It depends on an estimation of the risk
of CVD in each individual. In individuals at
higher risk, aspirin for primary prevention may be associated with
greater benefit.
Caution when prescribing primary prevention aspirin in
patients with hypertension. Hypertension is the major risk for hemorrhagic
stroke. Aspirin may be more dangerous in patients with hypertension because of
its association with hemorrhagic stroke.
BP should be well-controlled before aspirin is prescribed for primary
prevention.
“A Major
Modifiable Risk Factor” Eat Five or
More Fruits and Vegetables Daily
1-8 FRUIT AND VEGETABLE
CONSUMPTION
AND STROKE
Epidemiological
studies suggest that increased consumption of fruits and vegetables may be
associated with reduced risk of stroke. The extent of the association is
uncertain.
This
meta-analysis assessed the relation quantitatively.
Literature
search entered 8 studies which met inclusion criteria. (Over 257 000
individuals)
Determined
frequency of fruit and vegetable intake and correlated it with frequency of
incident stroke.
Grouped
consumption into 3 categories: 1) less
than 3 servings daily; 2)
Average
follow-up = 13 years
Relative
risk of stroke:
Less than 3
servings 1.00
3 to 5
servings 0.89
More than 5
0.74
Fruit and
vegetables had a protective effect on both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.
Increased
fruit and vegetable intake in the range commonly consumed (over 5 servings
daily) was associated with reduced risk of stroke.
The
Population Impact Of The MetS Is Much Greater.
1-9 METABOLIC SYNDROME COMPARED
WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES AS A RISK FACTOR FOR STROKE. The Framingham Offspring Study
This study
compared the risk of stroke in patients with DM2-alone, and with MetS-alone.
Estimated the population-attributable risk of stroke associated with each.
Over 10
years, the relative risk (RR) of stroke of persons with MetS-alone (compared to
those without either
DM2 or the MetS) = 2.10. The RR of
stroke in persons with DM2-alone was 2.5.
The
prevalence of the MetS-alone in the general population was much greater than
prevalence of DM2-alone. Consequently,
the population-attributable risk of stroke associated with the MetS-alone was
larger than the risk of stroke associated with DM2. This was despite the higher
RR of stroke associated with DM2-alone
Hyperinsulinemia
and insulin resistance are accepted as prominent features of MetS. This
suggests that, like impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose,
MetS may signal a prediabetic state. In the Framingham Heart Study cohort,
those with MetS had a 5-fold risk of developing diabetes.
Because
MetS is much more prevalent than diabetes, the population impact of the
syndrome is greater.
There is a
great potential for substantial reductions in stroke risk in people with MetS
by treatment of its
components.
----------
MetS-alone per 100 000 population Risk of stroke over 10 years Abs. number experiencing stroke
22% X 100 000 = 22 000 37/461
= 0.08 or 8% 22 000 X 0.08 =
1765
DM2 per 100 000 population Risk of stroke over 14 years Abs. number experiencing stroke
5% X 100 000 = 5000 12/99
= 0.121 or 12.1% 5000 X 0.121 =
606
Thus, stroke occurred more than 3 times as frequently
in persons with MetS-alone as with DM2-alone.
One in four adult Americans has MetS. This is a
national disgrace. And a massive Public Health problem. Primary care clinicians
bear a great responsibility for guiding patients for prevention, and for treatment once it is established. Clinicians should take the lead by preventing
themselves from
developing MetS.
Practical Pointers has reported many studies regarding
the MetS. To refresh memory, the
diagnosis requires 3 of 5 criteria to be present:
1) Elevated fasting Blood glucose -- 100-125 mg/dL
2) BP 130/85 or over, or treatment with
antihypertension medication
3) Triglycerides 150 and over
4) HDL-c < 40 in men and < 50 in women
5) Waist circumference > 88 cm in women and >
102 cm in men.
Not all 5 criteria carry equal weight in their
association with risk. It is becoming more evident that abdominal obesity may
be the greatest culprit. It may carry the greatest potential for development of
insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia.
Eradication
Results in Modest Improvements in Patients with Dyspepsia
1-10 IMPACT OF HELICOBACTER ERADICATION
ON DYSPEPSIA, HEALTH RESOURCE USE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE; The Bristol Helicobacter Project.
This study
determined the impact of a community-based H
pylori screening and eradication program on incidence of dyspepsia.
A program
in 7 general practices screened over 10 500 unselected individuals for H pylori. About 25% had dyspepsia. All
were screened by a 13C urea breath test. 15% were positive. Of these, 1558 were
randomized to a 2 week course of 1)
eradication treatment with ranitidine bismuth citrate and clarithromycin,
or 2) placebo.
Followed
for up to 2 years for rates of primary care consultations for dyspepsia to
determine if eradication influenced subsequent dyspepsia.
Treatment
eradicated 91% of the infections.
Subsequently
consulted for dyspepsia over the subsequent 2 years:
Treated
group 55/787 = 7/100
Placebo
group 78/771 = 10/100
Number
needed to treat to avoid one subsequent consultation for dyspepsia = 33.
----------
As the investigators suggest, a trial entering only
patients with dyspepsia (rather than patients selected from the general
population) would likely yield a greater benefit from treatment. .
In general, treatment of the infection in patients
with functional dyspepsia associated with H pylori will relieve the symptom in
about 5% to 10%. Whether to test and treat depends on negotiations between
patient with dyspepsia and physician. The patient may be told that eradication
will cure and prevent peptic ulcer, and prevent some gastric cancers. The
downside would be the cost and possible adverse effects of eradication
treatment. And the likely increase in resistance of the organism to
clarithromycin.
The study presents a good estimate of the percentage
of free-living persons in the community who have the infection (~5% to 10%). I
suspect the percentage is similar in the
I suspect that, patients presenting to primary care
with prolonged and troublesome dyspepsia will most likely be asked to consider
endoscopy first. This would relieve anxiety and lead to more definitive
therapy. If the outcome were functional dyspepsia, a “test and treat” approach
would lead to reduction in symptoms in a minority of patients.
Fewer False
Negative and False Positive Tests
1-11 CDC RECOMMENDS NEW TUBERCULOSIS
BLOOD TEST. QuantiFERON-TB Gold
The
QuantiFERON-TB Gold
in vitro test replaces the older QuantiFERON-TB test which is no longer available. The CDC
believes it is more accurate and represents a considerable advance over the
original QuantiFERON-TB test. (MMWR
The test
detects the release of interferon-gamma in fresh heparinized whole blood from
sensitized persons when it is incubated with two synthetic peptides which
simulate two proteins present in M tuberculosis.
Magnetic
bracelets, insoles, wrist and knee bands are claimed to be therapeutic. They
have been advertised to cure a vast array of ills, particularly pain. A Google
search yielded over 20 000 pages, most of which tout healing properties.
Many
“controlled” experiments are suspect because it is difficult to blind subjects.
Published
research, both theoretical and experimental, is weighted heavily against any
therapeutic benefit.
“Patients
should be advised that magnet therapy has no proved benefits.” If they insist
on using a magnetic device, they could be advised to buy the cheapest. This
will at least alleviate the pain in their wallet.”
----------
The powerful placebo effect undoubtedly influences
patients’ perception of benefit.
How should primary care clinicians advise magnet-use
for their patients? I believe it depends on the circumstances:
1) If patients ask beforehand if magnets provide any
benefit, they can be advised that there is no scientific evidence that they
benefit. Then let the patients decide.
2) If patients are already using magnets and claim
they receive benefit, I would be reluctant to dissuade them. I would let the
placebo effect lie unrestrained. There
is no associated harm.
1-13
VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM—18 POINTS
(Review articles appear frequently. They are interesting and informative, but
long and difficult to abstract. This is an experiment. These few points
emphasize the important and serve as a memory-jogger. Is it helpful? I would appreciate feed-back. Is it helpful?
RTJ)
ABSTRACTS
JANUARY 2006
One Simple
Non-Threatening Question To Probe Spiritual Concerns At The End Of Life.
1-1 ARE YOU AT PEACE?
Acknowledging
the importance of emotional and spiritual issues at the end of life constitutes
compassionate and comprehensive palliative care. Some physicians may question
the appropriateness of their role in probing patients’ spiritual distress, as
well as the practicality of addressing such issues in the time-limited setting
of usual practice. Yet, a patient’s spirituality often influences treatment
choices, and endows personal resources during serious illness.
A practical
and evidence-based approach to discussing spiritual concerns, such as this
investigation presents, may improve quality of care at the end of life.
Previous
investigations reported that a positive end-of-life experience is associated
with “coming to peace”, or “being at peace”. For many persons, this sense of peacefulness
in related to a religious notion of “being at peace with God”; for others it is a non-theological sense of
tranquility. A sense of peacefulness may result from a clear decision about
whether to continue chemotherapy, or assurance that pain and symptoms will be
managed.
In some
circumstances, peacefulness may lie in resolving conflicts with a loved one or
within oneself; or in the relationship with God. Spiritual reflection on the
meaning of illness may precede the subjective experience of peacefulness.
Resolution
within the biomedical, psychosocial, and spiritual domains of life often
precedes the experience of peacefulness. For some patients at the end of life,
attention to issues of peacefulness is related to an antecedent, broader theme
of life-closure, or “completion”.
This study
explored the applicability of the concept of peacefulness, and translated
qualitative attributes of what is important at the end of life into
quantitative terms.
Conclusion: Asking patients about the extent to which
they are at peace offers a brief gateway to assessing spiritual concerns.
STUDY
1.
Respondents (n = 248) completed several questionnaires which assessed
quality-of-life at the end of life. All had advanced cancer, severe heart
failure, severe COPD, or renal failure.
2.
Examined distributions of several religious and non-religious alternative
wordings “at peace with God”; “at peace with my personal relationships”; “at
peace with myself”.
3.
To promote inclusiveness, the final wording was the simple question--“Are you
at peace?”
RESULTS
1.
Ninety % agreed with the importance of
“coming to peace with God”.
2.
Ranked equally, and as most important, “freedom from pain” and “being at peace
with God”.
3.
Items measuring peacefulness correlated highly with having a chance to say
goodbye; with making a positive difference in the lives of others; giving
others gifts and wisdom; sharing deepest thoughts; and having a sense of meaning in life.
4.
Variations in patient responses were not explained by demographic categories,
or diagnosis. There was a broad applicability across patients
5.
Feeling at peace was strongly correlated with emotional and spiritual
well-being.
6.
Older patients with advanced illness reported greater levels of
peacefulness.
DISCUSSION
1.
Dying patients confront complex spiritual concerns that influence the course of
their illness, treatments chosen, relationships with loved ones, and overall
quality of life.
2.
These fundamental issues may not be readily elicited in the usual clinical
encounter. Clinicians may struggle to initiate such a discussion in a
non-threatening, inclusive manner. How the question is asked is important.
“What are your religious or spiritual beliefs?” may evoke mistrust and intrude
on personal boundaries, causing patients to question physicians’ motivations.
3.
“The results of this study suggest that the concept of patients’ sense of being
at peace may be a point in which to initiate a conversation about emotional and
spiritual concerns in a non-threatening
manner.”
4.
Spirituality has been defined as the search for the ultimate meaning and
purpose of life. This often involves a relationship with the transcendent.
Emotional and spiritual well-being underpin the broadly worded construct of
“being at peace”.
5.
The concept of asking about peace may be a gateway to larger discussions about
values, preferences, and life experiences.
6.
Patients’ end-of-life experiences are constructed by multidimensional layers of
relationships of physiological and biochemical processes, cognitive
understandings, interpersonal connections, and bonds to the transcendent.
Asking patients about the extent to which they are at peace may initiate
discussions that relieve suffering in all of these dimensions.
7.
Indeed, spiritual concerns affect patients’ choices throughout life, not only
at end-of-life.
CONCLUSION
Asking
patients about the extent to which they are at peace may offer a gateway to
assessing spiritual concerns. Although these
issues may be heightened at the end of life, it may influence medical
decisions throughout a lifetime of care.
Archives Int Med
1-2 IMPACT OF ADVERSE EVENTS ON
PRESCRIBING WARFARIN IN PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
Long-term
anticoagulation with warfarin reduces the risk of stroke associated with atrial
fibrillation (AF). Only 30%-60% of appropriate patients receive
warfarin. Physicians’ overestimation the risks of anticoagulation is the most
consistently cited explanation for the observed patterns of use.
This study
quantified the influence of physicians’ experiences of adverse events in
patients for whom they had prescribed warfarin on their subsequent prescribing
practices.
Conclusion: Physicians’ experience with bleeding events
can influence their subsequent prescribing habits. Conversely, ischemic stroke
occurring in patients with AF who were not
treated with anticoagulation may not
affect subsequent prescribing.
STUDY
1.
Retrospective cohort study included all patients with AF admitted to the
hospital for 1) major hemorrhage while taking warfarin, and 2) patients with AF
who experienced an embolic stroke while not
taking warfarin.
2.
Considered patients who experienced severe gastrointestinal bleeding or
hemorrhagic stroke while taking warfarin during the 120 days before admission
to the hospital. Determined likelihood
that the doctor who prescribed the warfarin would prescribe it to the next
patient presenting with AF. If a physician treated a patient with warfarin and
the patient had serious bleeding, would this experience influence prescribing
warfarin for a second patient who has AF?
3.
Considered patients with AF who experienced an ischemic stroke during the
preceding 120 days for whom the doctor had not
prescribed warfarin. Determined the likelihood that the doctor would prescribe
warfarin to the next patient with AF who consults him.
RESULTS
1.
Over 500 physicians treated a patient with AF who had major bleeding while on
warfarin, and then treated another patient with AF within the next 90 days.
2.
The odds that a physician would prescribe warfarin for a second patient were
21% lower after a first patient experienced bleeding. (Ie, some physicians were
reluctant to again prescribe warfarin.)
3.
Conversely, there were no significant changes in warfarin prescribing after a
patient had a stroke while not taking
warfarin. (Ie, the physician was no more
likely to prescribe warfarin for a second patient with AF despite this
adverse outcome.)
DISCUSSION
1.
“Our findings provide further insight about reasons for underuse of warfarin in
the treatment of atrial fibrillation.”
2.
And more generally, about patterns of care for other similar conditions.
BMJ January 21, 2006; 332:
141-43 Original investigation, first
author Niteesh K Choudhry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
An
editorial in this issue of BMJ (p 129-130) by Kieran Sweeney,
The study
is a brave attempt to quantify the under-recognized notion of personal
knowledge in clinical practice. The researchers wanted to know if a previous
adverse event affected subsequent prescribing.
“Doctors
are neither passive recipients of, nor simple conduits of, clinical evidence.”
We conduct an “inner consultation” with evidence, analyzing it in both a
logical and intuitive way. In doing so, we are more likely to recall events
which are more easily recalled. And the “chagrin factor” tends to make doctors
avoid actions that cause them hassle.
Patients
conduct similar internal consultations, adding the experience of a consultation
to their previous intellectual and emotional understanding of illness.
“Statistical experience” and “clin